# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` - It achieved the highest average FPS, significantly exceeding others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `flash` - This had the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating the most stable FPS. * **Best overall**: `flash` - Despite not having the highest FPS, it maintains excellent stability with a comparably high FPS. # Issues: * The run using `bpfland-next` demonstrated noticeably lower FPS compared to others, with a decrease of approximately 7% in average FPS relative to the smoother `flash`. * The `bpfland-next` configuration also had higher variance in frame time, indicating more fluctuation and less smoothness during gameplay. # Summary This benchmark compared different configurations of the "osu!stable" under various settings, primarily focusing on cache and optimization techniques. The `BORE` setup delivered the highest FPS, but its stability was not the best. Meanwhile, the `flash` configuration showcased the smoothest and highly stable performance, making it the optimal choice for balance between performance and reliability. Conversely, the `bpfland-next` configuration fell behind regarding both FPS and stability, suggesting less efficiency and effectiveness in this setup compared to others tested in this benchmark. Overall, stability varied across different configurations which demonstrates how different optimization strategies can impact both graphical performance and user experience in practical scenarios.