Top runs:

• Highest FPS: BORE with approximately 4% higher average FPS than the nearest competitor, providing the best performance.
• Smoothest FPS: flash-k with approximately 43% lower standard deviation in FPS compared to the next smoothest option, ensuring the most stable experience.
• Best overall: BORE achieves balanced stability and the highest FPS, boasting a more consistent performance relative to the highest-frame-rate discrepancies.

Issues:

• flash has approximately 15% lower FPS than the best performing results, indicating reduced performance.
• bpfland and bpfland-next have comparable FPS values but introduce slight inconsistencies in frame stability in comparison to the top choices.

Summary

This benchmark compares the performance of different scheduling options on CachyOS using identical hardware, with BORE, bpfland, bpfland-next, and flash runs. The BORE configuration exhibits superior FPS despite varying slightly in smoothness when compared to flash-k. Meanwhile, bpfland-next maintains higher FPS and improved frame times over bpfland, but neither matches the smooth and stable performance observed in flash-k. Overall, BORE provides the most balanced outcome with superior FPS performance across runs.