# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with approximately 4% higher average FPS than the nearest competitor, providing the best performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `flash-k` with approximately 43% lower standard deviation in FPS compared to the next smoothest option, ensuring the most stable experience. * **Best overall**: `BORE` achieves balanced stability and the highest FPS, boasting a more consistent performance relative to the highest-frame-rate discrepancies. # Issues: * `flash` has approximately 15% lower FPS than the best performing results, indicating reduced performance. * `bpfland` and `bpfland-next` have comparable FPS values but introduce slight inconsistencies in frame stability in comparison to the top choices. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of different scheduling options on CachyOS using identical hardware, with `BORE`, `bpfland`, `bpfland-next`, and `flash` runs. The `BORE` configuration exhibits superior FPS despite varying slightly in smoothness when compared to `flash-k`. Meanwhile, `bpfland-next` maintains higher FPS and improved frame times over `bpfland`, but neither matches the smooth and stable performance observed in `flash-k`. Overall, `BORE` provides the most balanced outcome with superior FPS performance across runs.