# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with approximately 6% higher mean FPS compared to `flash-k`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating more stable frame rates. * **Best overall**: `lavd` offers a balance with high mean FPS and the lowest variance, making it the best choice overall. # Issues: * The `BORE` configuration shows significantly less stability in FPS with a 15% higher variance compared to `lavd`, although it provides the highest FPS. This may indicate fluctuation in frame times, affecting smooth gameplay. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of three scheduling configurations - `flash-k`, `lavd`, and `BORE` - under the `powersave` Linux scheduler on the same hardware setup, which includes an AMD Radeon GPU and an AMD Ryzen 5 CPU on CachyOS. The `lavd` configuration emerges as the best overall, delivering a smooth gaming experience with the most stable FPS, whereas `BORE` achieves the highest FPS but at the cost of stability. Both `flash-k` and `lavd` provide stable performances, but `lavd` edges out with a slightly higher FPS and lower variance.