# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with approximately 46% higher mean FPS compared to other configurations. * **Smoothest FPS**: `lavd` with the lowest FPS variance, providing approximately 57% less variability than others. * **Best overall**: `BORE` offers a good balance with significant FPS and moderate stability given the test conditions. # Issues: * The configuration with the `bpfland-next` kernel shows a 19% lower mean FPS compared to the other configurations, highlighting a potential performance limitation or inefficiency with this kernel version. # Summary This benchmark evaluates different Linux kernel configurations, comparing the performance of `BORE`, `BORE + PREEMPT_LAZY`, `bpfland-next`, and `lavd` schedulers on the same hardware setup with `CachyOS`. The results indicate that the `BORE` configuration significantly outperforms others in terms of FPS, especially compared to the `bpfland-next` kernel, which lags behind in performance. Furthermore, `lavd` provides the most consistent FPS delivery, showcasing excellent stability. These findings suggest that `BORE` and `lavd` are promising for use cases requiring high performance and stability, respectively.