# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland` with an average FPS approximately 2% higher than `flash`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland` with slightly lower standard deviation and variance than `flash`. * **Best overall**: `bpfland` provides the highest average FPS and slightly smoother performance overall. # Summary The benchmark compares two Linux schedulers, `bpfland` and `flash`, on the same hardware. Both runs maintain similar hardware and software configurations, including the same OS, Linux kernel, and CPU. While both offer consistent performance and high FPS rates, the `bpfland` scheduler edges out with a slightly higher average FPS and more stable frame times indicated by lower variance, making it the superior choice in this benchmark scenario.