# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-next` with approximately 2% higher average FPS compared to the others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland-main` with a standard deviation about 2% lower than the others, indicating less variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-main` due to its combination of low standard deviation with competitive FPS, making it optimal in performance stability. # Issues: * The `bpfland-next-k` configuration is slightly behind the other two setups in terms of average FPS, showing a reduction of around 2%. While not drastically lower, it's less optimal than the others. # Summary Comparing three different configurations using the `bpfland` Linux scheduler on the `CachyOS` operating system with a consistent hardware profile shows intriguing performance differences. The `bpfland-next` configuration topped in FPS figures, but the `bpfland-main` maintained the best performance stability, having the lowest standard deviation in FPS and providing overall the best gaming experience in this benchmark. The `bpfland-next-k` configuration slightly underperforms in terms of average frame rate, suggesting it’s less optimized for this specific scenario, though all setups show strong performance.