# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `EEVDF` with a mean FPS only slightly higher than other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Flash` with the lowest standard deviation in FPS, indicating more consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `EEVDF` performed marginally better in FPS with an acceptable consistency, making it the best choice considering both factors. # Issues: * The run utilizing `LAVD` scheduler had a notably lower mean FPS, showing a decrease of approximately 2% compared to other runs. This lessened performance could be a significant drawback in a gaming scenario. # Summary In this benchmark, different Linux schedulers were compared with the `powersave` scheduler used in combination with the `EEVDFrc7` kernel on `CachyOS`. The `EEVDF` scheduler provided the highest average FPS with stable performance, whereas the `Flash` scheduler showed the smoothest gameplay with the lowest frame variance. However, the `LAVD` scheduler exhibited a notable drop in FPS, highlighting potential inefficiencies in handling gaming workloads. Overall, most configurations delivered competitive results except for the `LAVD` scheduler.