# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `p2dq` with approximately 2% higher average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` with roughly 25% lower standard deviation in FPS, indicating greater stability. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland` due to its combination of relatively high FPS and smooth frame delivery (lowest variance and standard deviation among the runs with competitive FPS). # Issues: * The `LAVD` run exhibited a higher variance in FPS, approximately 30% more compared to the most stable runs, which indicates less consistent performance. * The CPU temperature in the `Bpfland` run was noticeably lower, about 4% compared to other runs, which could suggest differences in cooling efficiency or processor load that are not an intended part of the scheduling performance comparison. # Summary This benchmark compares various Linux schedulers, particularly `BORE`, `BPFLAND`, `FLASH`, `LAVD`, `P2DQ`, and `RUSTY`, in terms of their performance on the Gothic 1 Remake using the `powersave` power profile within the Linux kernel version `6.14rc4` on `CachyOS`. The focus of the benchmark is on how different scheduling strategies affect gaming performance, measured via FPS and stability metrics under consistent hardware and graphics settings. Overall, the `BPFLAND` scheduler showcases superior performance in terms of stability and consistent frame delivery, while `P2DQ` achieves the highest average FPS. However, consistent factor differences such as lower CPU temperature in certain runs suggest possible external influences not related to scheduler performance, which is essential for accurately interpreting these results.