# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Flash` and `Flash-next` with around 1% higher FPS compared to most other runs, providing a notable performance boost with similar stability. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Flash-next` with significantly lower standard deviation and variance, indicating a more stable and smooth experience. * **Best overall**: `Flash-next`, offering a balance of high FPS and smooth performance with improved stability compared to most other runs. # Issues: * `LAVD` showed significantly lower performance in terms of FPS, approximately 3% lower than others, with a much higher standard deviation, indicating less stability. # Summary This benchmark compares different `sched_ext` implementations, specifically focusing on how they manage FPS and stability in the game Rocket League running on Linux kernel 6.14-rc5. Among the schedulers, `Flash-next` stands out, delivering both high FPS and reduced variability in frame time, making it a favorable choice for achieving a smooth gaming experience. On the other hand, the `LAVD` scheduler performed noticeably worse in terms of both FPS and stability, suggesting that it may not be suitable for tasks demanding high performance consistency.