Benchmark #113

Download
Elden Ring BORE/LAVD/LAVD-NO-COMPACTION

This is captured on sched-ext from main (https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/tree/d4a5a629ffc5d01768f6052b1156c9b0479d0f70) with https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/456 and https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/457 backported. This is Elden Ring while in a static scenario while not GPU limited with very low GPU load (~30%)

Submitted 3 months ago by summedkibbles36

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
LAVD-NO-COMPACTION-4 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
LAVD-NO-COMPACTION-3 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
LAVD-NO-COMPACTION-2 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
LAVD-NO-COMPACTION-1 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
LAVD-3 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
LAVD-2 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
LAVD-1 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
BORE-3 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
BORE-2 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
BORE-1 Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.10.1-cb1.0.fc41.x86_64 performance
### Top Runs - **Highest FPS**: `BORE-1`, which had a 4% higher mean FPS compared to the next best run. - **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD-NO-COMPACTION-3`, with a 27% lower variance in FPS compared to the mean variance. - **Best Overall**: `BORE-3`, due to a combination of steady FPS performance and moderate variance, making it a balanced choice. ### Summary The benchmark tests reveal that all runs were conducted with consistent hardware and software environments, making the FPS and variance metrics directly comparable. BORE runs generally exhibit higher mean FPS, indicating better performance, while LAVD runs focus more on stability with lower variances. BORE-1 emerged as the leader in terms of performance, showing an FPS advantage. On the other hand, LAVD-NO-COMPACTION-3 provided the smoothest gaming experience with the lowest FPS variance. However, the overall top performer is BORE-3, which effectively balances high FPS and low variance without exhibiting any significant issues. No major issues were detected across the benchmark runs.