Benchmark #1138

Download
EEVDF vs SCX schedulers in Rocket League | kernel 6.14rc6

Rocket League | first two minutes of match replay | no additional workload | Ryzen 5700X | RTX 3060Ti | power profile balanced

Submitted 3 weeks ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
Bpfland CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.0-rc6-1EEVDF powersave
EEVDF CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.0-rc6-1EEVDF powersave
Flash CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.0-rc6-1EEVDF powersave
LAVD CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.0-rc6-1EEVDF powersave
p2dq CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.0-rc6-1EEVDF powersave
Rusty CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.0-rc6-1EEVDF powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Flash` with a mean FPS advantage of around 1% compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Rusty` as it offers roughly 7% less variance in FPS compared to the most stable alternatives, despite capturing a high FPS. * **Best overall**: `Rusty` with high FPS and smooth performance balancing both high frames and stability effectively. # Issues: * The scheduler labeled as "LAVD" experienced lower FPS, approximately 4% less than others. Furthermore, its variance was notably higher, indicating significant inconsistency compared to other schedulers. # Summary This benchmark analyzes the performance of various schedulers using the `Linux kernel 6.14rc6` on `Rocket League`. The runs were executed on a `CachyOS` environment with consistent hardware specifications, specifically employing a `Ryzen 5700X` processor and an `RTX 3060Ti` GPU. Of the schedulers tested, options like `Bpfland`, `EEVDF`, `Flash`, `p2dq`, and `Rusty` maintained commendable performance with minimal variation both in terms of FPS and frametime. Notably, the `Rusty` scheduler stood out with a balanced approach of delivering strong FPS performance while retaining smooth and consistent gameplay. The `LAVD` scheduler, however, lagged in terms of FPS stability and consistency.