# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` provides the highest mean FPS with 12% more than the next closest run, indicating superior performance in raw frame rate. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD-NO-COMPACTION` offers the smoothest gameplay experience with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, resulting in the most consistent frame times. * **Best overall**: `BORE` is the best overall run, balancing higher average FPS (12% more compared to the closest run) with acceptable frame time variability, though slightly higher compared to `LAVD-NO-COMPACTION`. # Issues: * `LAVD` experiences a 10% lower mean FPS and slightly higher frame time variance compared to `BORE`, suggesting a less optimal performance. * `LAVD` configuration is similar to the others, making the performance degradation puzzling without further hardware/software inconsistencies. # Summary This benchmark compared three different configurations (`LAVD-NO-COMPACTION`, `LAVD`, `BORE`) on the same system using `sched-ext`. Notably, `BORE` achieved the highest mean FPS, overshadowing both `LAVD` and `LAVD-NO-COMPACTION`. However, `LAVD-NO-COMPACTION` delivered the smoothest gameplay with the least frame time variability. The data suggests that the `BORE` scheduler implementation provides the most optimal overall performance, merging high frame rates with stable frame times, while `LAVD` falls behind in both metrics.