# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland-next` with a slightly higher average FPS compared to its counterpart. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland-next` with a lower standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating slightly more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland-next` due to its balance of higher FPS and stable performance. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of two Linux kernel scheduling configurations, `Bpfland` and `Bpfland-next`, on the same hardware and software setup while running a Rocket League replay. Both configurations demonstrate similar performance, but `Bpfland-next` edges out slightly with a marginally higher FPS and improved consistency in frame delivery. The results indicate that `Bpfland-next` provides a slight performance advantage, suggesting some enhancements in the kernel scheduler that positively impact gaming under this specific test setup.