### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `BORE`, achieving the highest average FPS with approximately 6% higher than the next best run. - **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland`, showing the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, about 10% more stable than other runs. - **Best Overall**: `BORE`, providing both the highest mean FPS and smooth stability, with only a slight increase in variance compared to `bpfland`. ### Issues - **bpfland_pd** run shows significantly worse performance compared to others, with nearly 10% lower mean FPS and 30% higher variance in frame time, pointing to potential instability issues in FPS. ### Summary All runs were conducted on the same hardware and software configuration, ensuring consistent comparison. Among them, `BORE` was the top performer in FPS and exhibited commendable stability, making it the best overall run. The `bpfland` run was the smoothest in terms of FPS stability, although it lagged behind in peak performance. On the other hand, `bpfland_pd` presented notable issues with lower FPS and much higher variability, indicating potential scheduling inefficiencies. Overall, while most runs performed similarly, slight variances highlighted the impact of different schedulers on gaming performance.