# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Elden Ring BPFLAND` achieves the highest average FPS with approximately 1-2% over the others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Elden Ring LAVD Autopilot` stands out for its smoothness, exhibiting the lowest standard deviation in FPS, which is about 10% better than the others, indicating more consistent frame times. * **Best overall**: `Elden Ring BPFLAND` offers the best overall performance, balancing the highest FPS with a reasonably smooth experience, only about 10% less smooth compared to the smoothest. # Issues: * The `Elden Ring BORE` configuration shows a notably higher variance in FPS when compared to the others, resulting in a slightly less stable performance despite similar hardware and software environment. # Summary This benchmark tests the impact of Elden Ring's performance using different scheduler configurations namely, BORE, BPFLAND `--performance`, LAVD `--performance`, and LAVD `--autopilot` on standardized hardware. The BPFLAND configuration shows superior performance with the highest average FPS, while LAVD Autopilot excels in minimizing frame time variance. The tests reveal that both the BPFLAND and LAVD Autopilot configurations deliver consistently exceptional outcomes that leverage their distinct strengths, showing varied benefits in either performance or stability, fully utilizing the stable Freedesktop SDK runtime and the AMD system setup. The BORE configuration faced issues as it had noticeably higher variance, suggesting some stability issues in comparison.