# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `EEVDF 1⁄3` with an average FPS slightly higher than other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `EEVDF 1⁄3` showing the lowest standard deviation and variance in frame time. * **Best overall**: `EEVDF 1⁄3` offering both the highest and the smoothest FPS. # Issues: * The runs with the SMT fix generally demonstrated higher variance in FPS, indicating less stability in frame rates. * CPU temperature appears slightly lower in the series with the SMT fix, despite the decreased performance. * The mean FPS in the SMT fix runs is consistently lower by a small margin compared to runs without the fix. # Summary This benchmark analysis highlights the performance differences between SMT-enabled (`EEVDF`) and SMT-fix (`EEVDF-FIX`) configurations for the Rocket League game. All tests were conducted under similar hardware and software configurations, specifically using the same `6.15rc1` Linux kernel and `powersave` scheduler on `CachyOS`. The non-SMT-fix setup, especially `EEVDF 1⁄3`, provided the best balance with the highest and smoothest FPS, while the SMT-fix configurations, despite showing slightly better CPU temperature management, resulted in lower performance and higher frame timing variance. This suggests that while the SMT-fix can offer procedural benefits, it compromises FPS performance and smoothness in this instance.