# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Performance 1⁄3` with a slightly higher average FPS compared to other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Performance 3⁄3` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating more consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `Performance 1⁄3` due to its combination of the highest average FPS with a reasonable level of FPS stability. # Issues: * The runs labeled with "Powersave" tend to have marginally lower FPS and slightly increased frame time variance compared to the "Performance" labeled runs. However, these differences are relatively minor given the context and may not be significant enough to cause substantial performance drops. * All runs used the same hardware and technical settings, ensuring a controlled comparison environment across different scheduler settings. # Summary The benchmark tests conducted under different performance states on "CachyOS" with the Ryzen 5700X and the Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti, using kernel version 6.15rc1, reveal that the "Performance" scheduler offers noticeably higher FPS compared to the "Powersave" scheduler. The difference in frame stability and performance, though existent, is subtle. This suggests that for workloads similar to a Rocket League replay scenario, the "Performance" scheduler ensures a better gaming experience than "Powersave", with increased frame rates and smoother gameplay being the key highlighted benefits.