# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland` offers the highest average frames per second with about 13% more FPS than `Bpfland-next`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` has the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating smoother performance with around 11% less fluctuation compared to `Bpfland-next`. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland` as it combines both the highest FPS and smoothest experience. # Issues: * The "Bpfland-next" run shows around 13% lower FPS compared to "Bpfland." This indicates a potential performance issue. * There is a notable increase in GPU utilization variance and standard deviation in "Bpfland-next" by approximately 50%, suggesting less stability in GPU load management, which isn't what was being compared directly but might contribute to the performance difference. # Summary The benchmark compares two Linux scheduling setups, `bpfland` and `bpfland-next`, on a Rocket League replay using the same hardware, operating system, and Linux kernel version. However, significant differences arise in FPS performance and stability, with `bpfland` delivering superior results, achieving around 13% more FPS with smoother frame time and lower fluctuation compared to `bpfland-next`. This indicates the current kernel scheduling setup in `bpfland-next` may lead to suboptimal CPU and GPU utilization, affecting overall game performance.