# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland-next-revert` with an average FPS approximately 20% higher than its closest competitor. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland-next-revert` showcases the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating relatively steady performance. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland-next-revert` balances high mean FPS and smooth FPS delivery making it the top performer overall. # Issues: * The original `Bpfland` and the `Bpfland-next-revert` configurations demonstrate significantly better FPS performance compared to the `Bpfland -n`, `Bpfland-next`, `Bpfland-next -n`, and `Bpfland-next-revert -n` setups, achieving a mean FPS roughly 20% higher. * Although all configurations utilized the same hardware and settings, the underlying `Bpfland` and `Bpfland-next-revert` versions offer a considerably more consistent performance with smoother FPS, evidenced by a standard deviation reduced by approximately one-third compared to the other setups. * CPU and GPU loads were consistently high across all configurations, but the `Bpfland -n` setups had a discernible lower GPU load, potentially impacting the FPS outcomes. # Summary In this set of benchmarks comparing `bpfland` variations within Rocket League, the `Bpfland`, and particularly the `Bpfland-next-revert`, displayed superior FPS performance and stability. They outperformed the `Bpfland -n`, `Bpfland-next`, `Bpfland-next -n`, and `Bpfland-next-revert -n` setups, demonstrating enhancements of around 20% in FPS on average. The `Bpfland-next-revert` configuration also showed the most stable FPS output, offering a better gaming experience as evidenced by its consistent frame delivery. All tests were conducted with identical hardware and operating conditions, suggesting the variations in results primarily stem from distinctions in the specific software configurations.