# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland` with approximately 4% higher average FPS compared to `Bpfland-next` * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` with approximately 19% lower FPS variance compared to `Bpfland-next`, indicating more stable performance. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland`, as it exhibits both higher FPS and better frame stability compared to `Bpfland-next`. # Summary In this benchmark, comparing the `Bpfland` and `Bpfland-next` configurations on the same hardware and operating system, it was observed that `Bpfland` performed better overall. It achieved higher and more stable frame rates, suggesting it is the preferable choice for smoother gameplay in Rocket League. Despite the lower FPS and higher variability in frametimes, `Bpfland-next` ran on the same system configuration, ensuring a direct comparison between these two kernel features, with `Bpfland` clearly leading in performance metrics amongst the two.