# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland` with a higher average FPS than the other run, providing a performance advantage in this aspect. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` with a lower standard deviation and variance in FPS, offering more consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland` offers the best balance between FPS stability and performance, slightly edge out the other configuration due to better smoothness and higher mean FPS. # Issues: * The configuration with `Bpfland-next` showed a decrease in mean FPS by approximately 3% and had a roughly 15% increase in FPS variance compared to its counterpart. This might affect the overall gaming experience by introducing less smooth gameplay. # Summary The benchmark compares the performance of the `Bpfland` and `Bpfland-next` configurations under identical hardware conditions, running on `CachyOS` with the `powersave` scheduler. Overall, `Bpfland` provided better performance in both average FPS and consistency, showing a clear advantage over `Bpfland-next`. The observed disparity in frame stability and average performance highlights improvements or optimizations possible in the current iteration of `Bpfland-next`.