Top runs:

• Highest FPS: Bpfland with a higher average FPS than the other run, providing a performance advantage in this aspect.
• Smoothest FPS: Bpfland with a lower standard deviation and variance in FPS, offering more consistent frame delivery.
• Best overall: Bpfland offers the best balance between FPS stability and performance, slightly edge out the other configuration due to better smoothness and higher mean FPS.

Issues:

• The configuration with Bpfland-next showed a decrease in mean FPS by approximately 3% and had a roughly 15% increase in FPS variance compared to its counterpart. This might affect the overall gaming experience by introducing less smooth gameplay.

Summary

The benchmark compares the performance of the Bpfland and Bpfland-next configurations under identical hardware conditions, running on CachyOS with the powersave scheduler. Overall, Bpfland provided better performance in both average FPS and consistency, showing a clear advantage over Bpfland-next. The observed disparity in frame stability and average performance highlights improvements or optimizations possible in the current iteration of Bpfland-next.