# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland` with a marginally higher mean FPS compared to `Bpfland-next`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` due to significantly lower standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland` offers both the highest FPS and smoother performance, making it the standout in these comparisons. # Summary This benchmark compared two Linux schedulers in a Rocket League match replay using identical hardware and system configurations. The `Bpfland` scheduler demonstrated superior performance in both FPS and frame stability compared to the `Bpfland-next` scheduler. While both runs showed similar environmental conditions and resource usage, `Bpfland` managed to offer a higher average FPS and better consistency, suggesting that it provides a more reliable gaming experience in this scenario.