# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland balanced` shows the highest average FPS, indicating superior graphical performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland performance` has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, making it the smoothest in terms of frame rate stability. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland performance` combines high FPS with excellent consistency in frame delivery, making it the best choice overall. # Issues: * The `Bpfland-next balanced`, despite utilizing the same hardware and similar configurations, shows a significantly lower average FPS compared to others, indicating suboptimal performance likely due to less efficient scheduling or resource usage. # Summary This benchmark compares the `Bpfland` and `Bpfland-next` scheduler implementations in a Rocket League replay using a balanced power profile with the `performance` Linux scheduler on CachyOS. Despite the same base conditions, the `Bpfland` scheduler demonstrates better performance overall, especially in the `performance` configuration, offering higher FPS and better frame time stability compared to the `Bpfland-next`. The results suggest that the current implementation of the next iteration may need optimizations to match or surpass the current `Bpfland` performance.