Top runs:

• Highest FPS: Bpfland balanced shows the highest average FPS, indicating superior graphical performance.
• Smoothest FPS: Bpfland performance has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, making it the smoothest in terms of frame rate stability.
• Best overall: Bpfland performance combines high FPS with excellent consistency in frame delivery, making it the best choice overall.

Issues:

• The Bpfland-next balanced, despite utilizing the same hardware and similar configurations, shows a significantly lower average FPS compared to others, indicating suboptimal performance likely due to less efficient scheduling or resource usage.

Summary

This benchmark compares the Bpfland and Bpfland-next scheduler implementations in a Rocket League replay using a balanced power profile with the performance Linux scheduler on CachyOS. Despite the same base conditions, the Bpfland scheduler demonstrates better performance overall, especially in the performance configuration, offering higher FPS and better frame time stability compared to the Bpfland-next. The results suggest that the current implementation of the next iteration may need optimizations to match or surpass the current Bpfland performance.