# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland-next performance` and offers a slight advantage in average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Flash performance` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating greater stability. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland performance` balances high FPS and relatively smooth performance, making it the best choice overall. # Summary In the comparison of `Bpfland` and `Bpfland-next`, as well as `Flash`, all running on `CachyOS` utilizing a `powersave` scheduler in a `Rocket League` replay scenario, different strategies exhibit various strengths. However, the `Bpfland performance` provides a superior balance between high FPS and frame time stability. Meanwhile, the `Bpfland-next performance` configuration achieves the highest FPS while the `Flash performance` offers the most stable experience with the least FPS variation. These insights can guide users in selecting a scheduler or configuration that best suits their performance needs in similar gaming workloads.