# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` which exhibited a marginally higher average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` due to its lower standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `BORE` as it balanced both high FPS and relatively stable performance. # Issues: * Performance of the setup using `Bpfland-next-old` was noticeably lower with around 4% reduced average FPS compared to the others, indicating potential inefficiencies or optimization issues. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance between different configurations in a Rocket League replay using the same hardware and the `powersave` scheduler on Linux kernel `6.15rc2`. The configurations labeled as `BORE`, `Bpfland`, `Bpfland-next-new`, and `Bpfland-next-old` were tested. Results show that the `BORE` configuration maintained the highest average FPS, while `Bpfland` offered the smoothest frame rate. The `Bpfland-next-old` configuration, however, underperformed, with a significantly lower average FPS, suggesting it may require further optimization. All tests were conducted under CachyOS with identical hardware settings ensuring a consistent comparison platform.