Benchmark #1297

Download
Bpfland vs Bpfland-next in Rocket League #11

Rocket League | first minute of match replay | no additional workload | Ryzen 5700X | RTX 3060Ti | power profile balanced | kernel 6.15rc2

Submitted 2 months ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
Bpfland CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.0-rc2-1BORE powersave
Bpfland-next CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.0-rc2-1BORE powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland` has slightly higher average FPS, offering about 1% more than its counterpart. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` also provides marginally smoother performance with about a 1% reduction in both standard deviation and variance of FPS compared to `Bpfland-next`. * **Best overall**: Given its slightly better FPS and smoother performance, `Bpfland` is best overall, showing a balanced improvement in both metrics. # Summary This benchmark compares the `bpfland` scheduler with its `bpfland-next` iteration while running Rocket League on a system with a Ryzen 5700X and RTX 3060Ti, both managed under a balanced power profile on CachyOS with a Linux 6.15rc2 kernel. Despite both schedules running under similar conditions with identical hardware configurations, the `bpfland` scheduler maintains a slight edge over `bpfland-next` in terms of both average FPS and smoothness, potentially indicating more optimized scheduling or resource allocation strategies in its current state.