# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland` has a slightly higher mean FPS than `Bpfland-next`, with an increase of about 0.3%. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland-next` offers slightly less variation in FPS as shown by a marginally lower standard deviation and variance. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland` is the preferred choice due to its slightly higher FPS and similar smoothness compared to `Bpfland-next`. # Summary In this benchmark comparison between `Bpfland` and `Bpfland-next` on `CachyOS` with a Ryzen 5700X processor and an RTX 3060 Ti GPU, both configurations use the `powersave` scheduler on Linux kernel `6.15rc2`. The `Bpfland` configuration provides the highest overall performance with a slightly higher average FPS, while `Bpfland-next` displays marginally lower frame time variation, indicating smoother gameplay. Both versions exhibit comparable results in terms of resource usage, affirming their consistency and reliability in a standardized gameplay environment.