# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland-next` with approximately 0.1% higher average FPS compared to `Bpfland`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland`, demonstrating about 1% lower standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating more stable performance. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland`, due to slightly smoother performance with only a marginally lower FPS than `Bpfland-next`. # Summary The benchmark compares the `Bpfland` and `Bpfland-next` schedulers in a Rocket League match replay scenario on similar hardware and software configurations. While `Bpfland-next` offers a slightly higher average FPS, `Bpfland` demonstrates better stability with a lower standard deviation in FPS, making it the preferable choice for smoother gameplay. This analysis highlights the subtle differences between two scheduler versions, each providing nearly indistinguishable performance from one another in terms of overall system utilization.