# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` performs with the highest average FPS, indicating strong overall performance in frame rendering. * **Smoothest FPS**: `p2dq` exhibits the lowest standard deviation and variance, providing the most consistent frame delivery among all runs. * **Best overall**: `BORE` offers the best balance between high FPS and reasonable frame consistency, making it the top performer overall. # Issues: * The test utilizing `LAVD` is noticeably underperforming with an FPS average significantly lower than the rest, coupled with the highest FPS variance. This can result in more noticeable frame rate fluctuations during gameplay. # Summary This benchmark compares various `SCX` schedulers against a `BORE` scheduler in a Rocket League replay environment, all performed on the same hardware and software setup including the `powersave` Linux scheduler. Particularly, the `BORE` scheduler excels with the highest FPS, demonstrating strong performance capabilities, while `p2dq` stands out for its exceptional frame rate consistency. However, the `LAVD` configuration struggles with both lower FPS and higher frame rate instability, highlighting potential inefficiencies compared to other configurations tested.