# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` offers the highest average FPS, outperforming the others by approximately 2-8%. * **Smoothest FPS**: `p2dq` shows the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating the smoothest performance with approximately 4% less fluctuation than others. * **Best overall**: `p2dq` balances both high FPS and stability, making it the standout performer for overall experience. # Issues: * The configuration with `LAVD` is notably underperforming compared to the others, showing approximately 7-10% lower average FPS. This could be an issue if smooth and high FPS are critical factors in consideration. # Summary This benchmark evaluates the performance of different `sched_ext` schedulers in Rocket League using a consistent hardware setup. Among the tested schedulers, `BORE` achieves the highest average FPS but at the cost of higher fluctuation in frame times. On the contrary, `p2dq` not only provides a relatively high FPS but also boasts the smoothest performance with minimal frame time variation. Meanwhile, the configuration using `LAVD` lags behind with a noticeable drop in FPS, suggesting that this scheduler may not be ideal for users prioritizing performance in gaming applications. Overall, both `BORE` and `p2dq` offer promising benefits depending on whether the primary focus is on raw FPS or smooth gameplay experience.