# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND` with approximately 1% higher mean FPS than others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND 1000`, which has about 20% lower variance compared to the next best. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND 1000`, because it combines both high FPS and smoothness. # Issues: * `P2DQ` and `P2DQ Autoslice` both experienced the lowest low 1% FPS, approximately 10% lower compared to other better-performing configurations. # Summary This benchmark evaluated different configurations of `BPFLAND`, `LAVD`, `P2DQ`, and others on a system using the Freedesktop SDK 24.08 runtime. The focus was on FPS performance in a GPU-limited scene, maintaining consistent settings across all tests. Notably, `BPFLAND` configurations showed the highest performance, with `BPFLAND 1000` providing the smoothest experience due to lower variation in FPS. `P2DQ` and its autoslice variant struggled in low FPS conditions, falling behind the overall performance consistency offered by `BPFLAND` and `LAVD`. The results indicate that `BPFLAND` offers a desirable balance of high and stable performance in this specific gaming context.