# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE 2` with approximately similar average performance as `BORE`, but slightly higher when analyzing detailed numbers. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD Performance` with the lowest frame time variance and standard deviation, indicating a more consistent and smooth experience. * **Best overall**: `BORE 2` provides the best overall experience with efficient performance, while maintaining low frame variability which doesn't significantly impact gameplay. # Issues: * The `LAVD Autopilot` run displayed noticeably lower FPS than most other runs, with its average FPS lagging by about 5% compared to the highest performing ones, which might not cater well to high-performance expectations. * Different temperatures in GPU readings were observed, with `BPFLAND` displaying different GPU temperatures, raising minor concerns over any potential unaddressed hardware configurations or thermal settings. # Summary The benchmark compares multiple Linux scheduler strategies (`BORE` and `BPFLAND`) and configurations (`LAVD Autopilot` and `LAVD Performance`) using an AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE GPU and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU on a consistent Linux setup with a heavy load scenario. `BORE 2` and `LAVD Performance` emerged as top performers, delivering high FPS and a smooth gaming experience respectively, while `BPFLAND`, with slightly reduced frame rates, still holds competitive value among the runs. Meanwhile, `LAVD Autopilot` struggled with FPS, suggesting it may not be the optimal choice for maximizing performance under heavy loads.