# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` achieved noticeably higher frame rates compared to the others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Rusty` had the lowest frame time standard deviation and variance among all runs, indicating the smoothest gameplay experience. * **Best overall**: `BORE` due to its significantly higher FPS despite having slightly higher variability than `Rusty`. # Issues: * The `SCX Bpfland` scheduler showed unexpectedly low FPS, performing over 80% worse compared to its counterparts. This significant drop in frame rates is not anticipated as all benchmarks were run on the identical hardware and software configurations. # Summary This benchmark comparison primarily aimed to evaluate the performance of various schedulers—`BORE`, `SCX Bpfland`, `Flash`, `LAVD`, `SCX p2dq`, and `SCX Rusty`—on a system running `Rocket League` during a kernel compilation task. The `BORE` scheduler delivered the highest frame rates, making it ideal for performance-critical tasks, whereas the `SCX Rusty` scheduler ensured the smoothest gameplay, pertinent for gamers valuing stability. Notably, the `SCX Bpfland` scheduler underperformed significantly, which could indicate areas for optimization or issues in implementation. Overall, the benchmark highlights the varied performance dynamics encountered with different scheduler implementations on a Linux system.