Benchmark #1329

Download
BORE vs SCX schedulers in Rocket League

Rocket League | first minute of match replay | no additional workload | Ryzen 5700X | RTX 3060Ti | power profile balanced

Submitted 2 days ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.3-2-cachyos powersave
Bpfland CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.3-2-cachyos powersave
Flash CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.3-2-cachyos powersave
LAVD CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.3-2-cachyos powersave
p2dq CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.3-2-cachyos powersave
Rusty CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.14.3-2-cachyos powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with a significantly higher average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Rusty` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating more consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `BORE`, due to its highest FPS while maintaining acceptable stability. # Issues: * The `LAVD` scheduler shows significantly lower FPS, with an average FPS drop of around 10% compared to other runs, indicating possible inefficiencies in handling game rendering performance. * The `LAVD` configuration also experienced a higher variance (over 10% higher than others in some cases), suggesting less consistent frame pacing. * All runs utilized the same hardware and software, confirming that observed differences are attributed to scheduler performance. # Summary This benchmark compares several schedulers, including `BORE`, `SCX`, `LAVD`, and others, in a Rocket League match replay scenario, utilizing a consistent hardware setup featuring a Ryzen 5700X CPU and RTX 3060 Ti GPU on CachyOS. The `BORE` scheduler notably delivers the highest FPS, making it the optimal choice for peak performance, while the `Rusty` scheduler provides the smoothest experience with the lowest frame time variance. Conversely, the `LAVD` scheduler falls short, showcasing reduced FPS and increased variability, highlighting potential inefficiencies in game rendering management. This analysis underscores the impact of selecting the right scheduler on gaming performance.