# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND 3000` with approximately 3.5% higher mean FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD Autopilot 1000`, featuring the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating the most stable FPS. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND 3000` due to the highest FPS with a relatively low variability in performance. # Issues: * Both the `BPFLAND 3000` and `LAVD Autopilot 1000` show a similar mean temperature for the GPU at around 56°C, while the `BORE` run registers at around 1% lower temperature. This temperature difference does not impact FPS but is noteworthy in terms of thermal performance. * All three configurations utilized the same hardware and OS, ensuring comparability across runs. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of different schedulers on a non-fully GPU-saturated scenario within Elden Ring, combined with significant background CPU load. The scheduler with the `scx_bpfland` configuration showed the highest FPS, attributing to its performance-friendly settings, making it the best overall choice given the context. Meanwhile, the `scx_lavd` configuration showcased smoother gameplay with lower variance in FPS, indicating better frame stability. The uniformity of the hardware and software configurations across runs enables a clear comparison and suggests the potential benefits of choosing different schedulers based on the desired balance between frame consistency and peak performance.