Benchmark #1352

Download
Halo CE Anniversary | BORE vs SCX

CPU Limited static scene from the second mission, with background load composed of Discord Call + 1080p60fps CPU encoded streaming. Remastered Graphics are used to not hit the engine frame cap of ~1000fps. 30 second frame recording with 0ms interval. Performance Governor/EPP | BORE default settings | BPFLAND -m performance | LAVD --autopilot | LAVD --performance

Submitted 3 days ago by summedkibbles36

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
BPFLAND Performance Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
LAVD Autopilot Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
LAVD Performance Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `LAVD Autopilot`, as it displays the highest average FPS among the runs, surpassing others by a noticeable margin. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD Autopilot`, as it has the lowest FPS standard deviation, indicating more consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `LAVD Autopilot`, due to its combination of the highest average FPS and lowest variability, providing both performance and stability. # Summary In this benchmark comparing different scheduler configurations under a comparable setup, the `LAVD` scheduler configurations, particularly the `Autopilot` mode, exhibit a superior performance profile. The focus was on CPU constrained environments with background tasks impacting resource allocation. Both `LAVD` settings excelled with higher FPS, yet the `Autopilot` variant provided smoother frame rates, making it the standout performer. All runs were consistent with the same hardware and software setups, emphasizing the impact of scheduler differences on performance.