# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` provides the highest average FPS, about 1% higher than the next best run. This indicates that `BORE` offers the most frames per second, indicating the capability for a smoother experience in terms of frame delivery rate. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, suggesting it provides the most consistent and smooth frame rates during the benchmark run. * **Best overall**: `BORE` is considered the best overall due to having the highest average FPS while still maintaining a competitive consistency in frame rates. # Issues: * The run with the `LAVD` scheduler presented the lowest FPS performance, with a mean FPS about 4% lower than the best-performing run, indicating underperformance relative to the other schedulers. * The use of the same hardware and configurations except varying schedulers shows the significance of scheduler choice rather than hardware on benchmark performance. # Summary This benchmark compares various schedulers in a controlled environment using the same hardware and software setup, focusing on `sched_ext` schedulers like `BORE`, `Bpfland`, `Flash`, `LAVD`, `p2dq`, `Rustland`, and `Rusty` within the context of Rocket League. The `BORE` scheduler offers the highest performance in terms of FPS, suggesting it handles workload distribution effectively for this game scenario. Meanwhile, `Bpfland` demonstrates the highest frame rate stability, providing an exceptionally smooth gaming experience. Overall, the choice of scheduler can significantly impact game performance, as evidenced by the differences in FPS and stability like those observed across these runs.