# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` achieved the highest average FPS, outperforming others by a noticeable margin. * **Smoothest FPS**: `P2DQ` delivered the smoothest performance with the lowest standard deviation and variance of FPS. * **Best overall**: `BORE` stands out as the best overall due to its high FPS and reasonable stability compared to other runs. # Issues: * All runs use the same hardware and settings, maintaining consistency across the benchmarks. However, the scheduler implementations have a noticeable impact on performance. * The `BPFLAND`, `LAVD`, and `RUSTY` implementations underperform significantly in terms of FPS compared to `BORE` and `P2DQ`, with up to approximately 15% lower average FPS. This suggests potential inefficiencies in those scheduling implementations. # Summary This benchmark assesses various scheduler implementations under a CPU-limited scenario in "Risk of Rain 2". The default BORE scheduler demonstrated superior performance both in terms of FPS and stability, indicating its effectiveness in managing processing loads in this context. The `P2DQ` scheduler also showed impressive stability, suggesting it as a viable option for a smooth experience, although slightly trailing in terms of average FPS. Conversely, the other schedulers such as `BPFLAND`, `LAVD`, and `RUSTY` did not perform as well, indicating areas for potential optimization within these implementations.