# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` has the highest average FPS, providing about 14% more frames per second compared to the second-best run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE` also shows the smoothest performance with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, reflecting consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `BORE` stands out as the best overall due to both highest performance and consistent frame times. The balance between FPS and stability makes it superior over other runs. # Issues: * Several runs under the `BPFLAND` label, particularly those using `--no-preempt` and `--no-wake-sync --no-preempt`, yielded noticeably lower FPS, by approximately 25% compared to the better performing runs. The significantly lower FPS in these runs could hint at configuration or scheduling inefficiencies when certain flags are used. * The `BPFLAND --no-preempt` and other similar configurations experienced increased variability in FPS, contributing to less stable gameplay experience. # Summary In this benchmark comparing different schedulers and configurations in a CPU-constrained scene in *Risk of Rain 2*, the results show that `BORE` outperforms its counterparts significantly, with superior FPS and stability. The `BPFLAND` runs with `--no-preempt` and similar flags show subpar performance and increased variability, suggesting inefficiencies in those configurations. Optimization seems critical for such scheduling strategies to potentially reach the performance levels of `BORE`. The test environment remained consistent across all runs, ensuring that observed differences are attributable to the scheduler configurations examined rather than hardware discrepancies.