# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with significantly higher mean FPS, providing a dominant performance in terms of raw frames per second. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND` with the smallest standard deviation, indicating a more stable frame rate across the benchmark. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND Next` with a balanced approach offering improvement in frame rate over `BPFLAND` while maintaining similar FPS stability. # Issues: * The configuration across all tests used the same hardware and software parameters, suggesting no discrepancies in setup. However, `LAVD` and `LAVD No Fork Penalty` runs had a notably lower FPS mean, about 14% below the top performers, indicating possible inefficiencies in these scheduler configurations under these test conditions. # Summary The benchmark compares the performance of different schedulers using the `performance mode` in a CPU-limited scenario without background load on a standard test environment. The `BORE` scheduler achieved the highest mean FPS, showcasing significant peak performance. However, for users prioritizing FPS smoothness, the `BPFLAND` scheduler proved to be the most stable. The variability in FPS among the test runs, particularly with `LAVD` configurations, indicates different efficiencies in managing CPU workloads, highlighting the impact that scheduling strategies can have on gaming performance.