# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` delivered the highest frame rate, surpassing others substantially with nearly 15% higher average FPS compared to the next best performer. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND` exhibited the most consistent frame rate with the lowest standard deviation and variance, offering a more stable gaming experience. * **Best overall**: `BORE` balances a high frame rate with acceptable stability, making it the best overall choice for this specific setup. # Issues: * The `BORE` scheduler presented a considerably lower consistency, indicated by its notably higher standard deviation compared to other configurations, although it achieved the highest FPS. * All other configurations performed similarly in terms of consistency but were substantially less effective at maximizing FPS. * It's important to note that all runs utilized the same hardware and software environment, ensuring a fair comparison. # Summary: This benchmark comparison reveals significant differences in performance when testing different scheduler configurations within a CPU-limited scene of "Risk of Rain 2." The `BORE` scheduler emerged as the top performer in terms of FPS, significantly outperforming all other tested schedulers, including the `BPFLAND` and `LAVD` variations. While `BORE` achieved the highest FPS, it did sacrifice some consistency relative to other runs. The analysis highlights the performance variations influenced only by the scheduler differences, as the underlying hardware and software parameters were consistent across all tests.