Benchmark #1384

Download
Halo Reach | BORE vs SCX

Varying scene from a clip, with background load composed of Discord Call + 1080p60fps CPU encoded streaming. 60 second frame recording with 0ms interval. Performance Governor/EPP | Performance mode used in all tests.

Submitted 2 weeks ago by summedkibbles36

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos2.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
BPFLAND Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos2.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
BPFLAND Next Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos2.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
LAVD Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos2.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
LAVD No Fork Penalty Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.14.4-cachyos2.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND Next` with an average FPS marginally higher than the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD` as it has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS among all runs. * **Best overall**: `LAVD` offers a balance with high FPS and the smoothest frame time delivery, making it the most stable performance without significantly sacrificing FPS when compared to the highest FPS run. # Summary The benchmark compared various scheduling implementations under consistent hardware and software configurations using a Halo Reach clip with a background load on a Linux system. The results showed that the `BPFLAND Next` implementation achieved the highest average FPS, indicating superior raw performance. However, the `LAVD` scheduler provided the smoothest gaming experience, achieving the lowest variability in frame times. These results highlight the difference between focusing purely on raw FPS numbers versus achieving a consistent and stable gameplay experience.