# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` and it has the highest average FPS and median value compared to others, indicating superior frame rates. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, leading to the most consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `BORE` offers the highest average FPS and relatively smooth performance, with a slight trade-off in stability for significantly better frame rates. # Summary This benchmark compares the `BORE` and `Bpfland` Linux schedulers in the context of playing Rocket League for one minute of a match replay under a performance power profile. All runs used the same hardware and kernel configurations, providing a fair comparison across different schedulers. The `BORE` scheduler achieved higher average frame rates, enhancing gaming experience despite slightly higher variability. Conversely, the `Bpfland` achieved a smoother experience with the lowest variability in frame delivery, making it preferable for more consistent frame timing. The `Bpfland-next` shows promise but needs optimization to match `BORE` in terms of FPS performance.