# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND Prev Next` with a mean FPS about 6% higher than the average of all runs, providing the highest frame rate performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE` with a standard deviation and variance around 23% lower than the average of all runs, offering the most stable frame experience. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND` offers a balance by providing high FPS just slightly below the top performer but with smoother performance than some higher FPS runs, ensuring a solid combination of speed and stability. # Issues: * The `LAVD` configuration underperformed with a mean FPS around 4% lower and stability metrics significantly below the leading configurations. However, there were no configuration differences in hardware or software settings compared to other runs. # Summary This benchmark compared different scheduler configurations in the `Elden Ring` game environment using the same hardware setup, CPU, GPU, and operating system under identical kernel and scheduler settings. The `BPFLAND` schedulers showed superior performance compared to other configurations, with `BPFLAND Prev Next` reaching the highest average FPS, while the `BORE` scheduler provided the smoothest gameplay. The `LAVD` configuration lagged behind in both FPS and consistency, suggesting it may not be optimal for achieving high performance in CPU-limited scenarios. Overall, this comparison highlights the impact of scheduler choice on performance, with `BPFLAND` versions generally outperforming the others.