# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland` with an average FPS slightly higher than `Bpfland-next`. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` with a lower standard deviation and variance than `Bpfland-next`. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland` due to a slight advantage in average FPS and smoother performance. # Summary In this benchmark comparison of `bpfland` implementations in Rocket League, both runs were conducted with identical hardware and software configurations, using the `performance` Linux scheduler. The primary objective was to evaluate the performance of the default and next-generation implementations. The run using the standard implementation achieved slightly higher average FPS, coupled with more consistent performance, indicated by the lower variance in frame times. Overall, the standard implementation exhibited superior performance metrics, both in terms of FPS and smoothness, compared to the next-generation implementation.