Top runs:

• Highest FPS: Bpfland with an average FPS slightly higher than Bpfland-next.
• Smoothest FPS: Bpfland with a lower standard deviation and variance than Bpfland-next.
• Best overall: Bpfland due to a slight advantage in average FPS and smoother performance.

Summary

In this benchmark comparison of bpfland implementations in Rocket League, both runs were conducted with identical hardware and software configurations, using the performance Linux scheduler. The primary objective was to evaluate the performance of the default and next-generation implementations. The run using the standard implementation achieved slightly higher average FPS, coupled with more consistent performance, indicated by the lower variance in frame times. Overall, the standard implementation exhibited superior performance metrics, both in terms of FPS and smoothness, compared to the next-generation implementation.