# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with a significantly higher average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND` demonstrating the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `BORE` combining the highest FPS with an acceptably low variability in frame rates. # Issues: * The performance of the different `scx` schedulers demonstrated substantially lower FPS in comparison to the `performance` mode BORE, suggesting potential optimization issues or scheduler inefficiencies causing decreased FPS performance across the board. # Summary This benchmark compared the performance of `BORE` with several `scx` scheduler variations, all running on identical hardware and configurations. The `BORE` significantly outperformed the `scx` schedulers in terms of average frame rates, demonstrating the limitations of the `scx` schedulers in keeping up with the FPS performance provided by `BORE`. However, among the `scx` schedulers, the performance fluctuations were minimized in `BPFLAND`, indicating smoother gameplay though not matching the FPS performance of `BORE`. Overall, there is a clear performance distinction where `BORE` delivers the best results under the performance mode, which may highlight areas for potential enhancement in the `scx` schedulers to optimize FPS rates.