# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Flash` with the highest mean FPS, providing an increase in performance compared to other schedulers. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Rusty` with the lowest standard deviation and variance, ensuring more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `Rusty` balances high FPS and smoothness of gameplay, making it the optimal choice. # Issues: * The configuration using the new `p2dq` displayed a lower FPS compared to other schedulers, with a decrease in mean FPS performance and an increase in variance, which indicates less consistency in frame times under the same system configuration. # Summary This benchmark assesses the efficacy of the `EEVDF` scheduler against various `SCX` schedulers in the context of running Rocket League on Linux kernel `6.15rc7` with options like `Rustland`, `Bpfland`, and `Flash`. The `Flash` configuration displayed the highest FPS among the runs, indicating aggressive performance tuning, while `Rusty` offered the smoothest gaming experience with minimal frame rate variance. The test emphasizes the impact different schedulers can have on gaming performance, with `Rusty` providing a well-rounded balance of high frame rates and frame consistency. Additionally, the introduction of the `p2dq` scheduler showed suboptimal performance, suggesting that adjustments or improvements are necessary for better gaming experience in this configuration.