# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with approximately 5% higher average FPS compared to the next closest run, providing the highest frame rate in this comparison. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD` due to having the lowest standard deviation and variance among the FPS values, suggesting a more consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `BORE` as it not only provides the highest average FPS but also maintains relatively low variability (with a variance around 11% higher than LAVD), making it the most favorable option for both performance and consistency. # Issues: * The runs labeled with the `BPFLAND` schedulers showcase significantly lower FPS, with an average frame rate reduction of about 10% compared to the leading run. Their FPS variability is noticeably higher, suggesting performance instability. * Configuration is consistent across all runs within the same hardware and software parameters, so the differences in performance stem solely from the scheduler implementations. # Summary In this benchmark, the performance of the `BORE` scheduler stands out by delivering the highest average FPS in a CPU-limited scenario within Elden Ring's Gatefront Ruins. While both the `LAVD` and `LAVD Autopilot` schedulers demonstrate smoother FPS with lower variance, the `BORE` scheduler balances high frame rates with acceptable consistency, making it the best overall choice. On the other hand, schedulers related to the `BPFLAND` implementation yield lower FPS and higher variability, indicating less favorable performance under the same testing conditions. This comparison highlights the impact of different scheduler implementations on the performance and stability of gaming experiences on Linux systems with AMD hardware.