# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND Next` with an average FPS slightly higher than others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND 3000` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating very stable performance. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND 3000` combines high FPS with the smoothest performance, making it the most well-rounded option. # Summary This benchmark analysis compared the performance of the `BPFLAND` configuration against the `BPFLAND Next` configuration in a CPU-limited gaming scenario within Elden Ring. Both configurations used identical hardware and software environments, including the same CPU, GPU, and Linux kernel. The results indicate that while `BPFLAND Next` offers slightly higher peak FPS, the `BPFLAND 3000` configuration delivers the smoothest frame times, reflecting superior performance stability. Ultimately, for those seeking a balanced approach between high FPS and smooth gameplay, the `BPFLAND 3000` configuration is the more favorable option.