Benchmark #1468

Download
BORE vs Bpfland in Rocket League

Rocket League | first minute of match replay | no additional workload | Ryzen 5700X | RTX 3060Ti | power profile performance

Submitted 2 weeks ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.0-2-cachyos performance
Bpfland-next -m all Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.0-2-cachyos performance
Bpfland-main -m all Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.0-2-cachyos performance
Bpfland-main Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.0-2-cachyos performance
Bpfland-next Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.0-2-cachyos performance
Bpfland 12th May Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 34 GB 6.15.0-2-cachyos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` - This run achieved the highest average FPS, providing the most fluid gameplay experience in terms of frame rates. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland 12th May` - This run had the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating the most consistency and stability in frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland 12th May` - Although slightly lower in FPS than `BORE`, it offers a more stable experience while maintaining high performance levels. # Issues: * The configuration labeled `Bpfland-main` experienced a significantly lower average FPS compared to the other runs, with a performance drop in the range of 5-6% relative to the others. This higher variance in FPS indicates potential instability or performance inefficiencies. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of two scheduling environments, `BORE` and `Bpfland`, within the game Rocket League. All runs were tested under the same conditions and hardware environments, utilizing a high-performance power profile. It was observed that while the `BORE` run provided the highest average FPS, indicating strong performance, the `Bpfland 12th May` run offered a more consistent experience due to its lower variance and standard deviation. Conversely, the `Bpfland-main` run fell behind, showing a noticeable decrease in average FPS, which suggests that this specific configuration may have some inefficiencies affecting its frame rate output.